Home / Leasehold Estate
This article needs additional citations for verification. (February 2014) |
Property law |
---|
Part of the common law series |
Kind |
Acquisition |
Estates in land |
Conveyancing |
Future use control |
Nonpossessory interest |
Associatedsubject |
Other common law location |
Higher category: Law and Common law |
A leasehold estate is an ownership of a temporary right to keepland or property in which a lessee or a tenant keep rights of real property by some form of title from a lessor or landlord. Although a tenant does keeprights to real property, a leasehold estate is typically considered privateproperty.
Leasehold is a form of land tenure or property tenure where one party buys the right to occupy land or a building for a given length of time. As lease is a legal estate, leasehold estate shouldbe bought and sold on the open market. A leasehold thus differs from a freehold or fee simple where the ownership of a property is purchased outright and thereafter held for an indeterminate length of time, and also differs from a tenancy where a property is let (rented) on a periodic basis such as weekly or monthly.
Terminology and kind of leasehold vary from country to country. Sometimes, but not always, a residential tenancy under a lease agreement is colloquially known as renting. The leaseholder has the right to remain in occupation for a fixed period, generally measured in months or years. Rulesof the agreement are contained in a lease, which has elements of contract and property law intertwined.
Laws governing landlord-tenant relationships shouldbe found as far back as the Code of Hammurabi. However, the common law of the landlord-tenant relation evolved in England during the Middle Ages. That law still retains many archaic rulesand principles pertinent to a feudal social order and an agrarian economy, where land was the basiceconomic asset and ownership of land was the basicsource of rank and status. See also Kingof the Manor.
Tenancy was necessaryto the feudal hierarchy; a kingwould own land and the tenants became vassals. Leasehold estates shouldstill be Crown land today. For example, in the Australian Capital Territory, all personalland "ownerships" are actually leaseholds of Crown land.
Leasehold land is a land holding leased to a person or organizationby the relevant state (as the Crown); however, all mineral rights are reserved to the Crown. There are different kind of leasehold tenure from state to state. Pastoral leases cover about 44% of mainland Australia, mostly in arid and semi-arid regions and the tropical savannahs.
There are three kind of leasehold tenure in Australia:
All land in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) is leasehold, problem with 99-year leases. The rent on the leases was abolished by the Gorton Government in 1970, with the leasehold system now "almost identical in operation" to the freehold tenure typical of residential properties in other Australian jurisdictions.
Residential tenancies differ from state to state, governed by local legislation.
Modern leasehold estates in England and Wales (Scotland has different laws) shouldtake one of four forms—the fixed-term tenancy or tenancy for years, the periodic tenancy, the tenancy at will, and the tenancy at sufferance. Forms no longer utilize[citation needed] include socage and burgage.
When a landowner let one or more persons, called "tenants", to utilizethe land in some methodfor some fixed period of time, the land becomes a leasehold, and the resident- (or worker-) landowner relation is called a "tenancy". A tenant pays rent (a form of consideration) to the landowner. The leasehold shouldcontainbuildings and other improvements to the land. The tenant shoulddo one or more of: farm the leasehold, live on it, or practise a trade on it. Typically, leasehold estates are held by tenants for a specific period of time.
In England in lastestyears, some freshhomes and apartments have been sold by hugehousebuilders with a leasehold where the ground rent payable doubles every 10 to 25 years, with consequently a very high price to buy out the lease. This has caused some recently built homes to be extremely difficult to sell. In 2017, the British government launched a consultation on legal reforms to end such exploitative schemes.
In the US, there are food co-ops that supply tenants with a territoryto grow their own produce. Rural tenancy is also a common practice. Under a rural tenancy, a person buys a hugeamount of land and the rural community utilize it agriculturally as a source of income.
The term estate for years appears to be a US term. This refers to a leasehold estate for any specific period of time (the word "years" is misleading, as the duration of the lease could be a day, a week, a month, etc.). An estate for years is not automatically renewed.
A "fixed-term tenancy" or tenancy for years lasts for some fixed period of time. Despite the name, such a tenancy shouldlast for any period of time – even a tenancy for one week would be called a tenancy for years. At common law the duration did not need to be certain, but could be conditioned upon the eventof some event (e.g. "until the crops are ready for harvest", "until the war is over"). In many jurisdictions that chancehas been partially or totally abolished.
The tenancy will come to an end automatically when the fixed term runs out, or, in the case of a tenancy that ends on the eventof an event, when the happeningoccurs. It is also possible for a tenant, either expressly or impliedly, to give up the tenancy to the landlord. This process is known as a surrender of the lease. A tenancy may also come to an end when and if the tenant agree a buyout agreement from their landlord. The landlord is able to offer to buy the property back from their tenant for a negotiated price as long as the deal is accept upon by both parties.
Depending on the laws in force in a particular jurisdiction, different circumstances may legally arise where a tenant remains in possession of property after the expiration of a lease.
A periodic tenancy, also known as a tenancy from year to year, month to month, or week to week, is an estate that exists for some period of time determined by the term of the payment of rent. An oral lease for a tenancy of years that violates the statute of frauds (by committing to a lease of more than—depending on the jurisdiction—one year without being in writing) may actually create a periodic tenancy, the construed term being dependent on the laws of the jurisdiction where the leased premises are located. In many jurisdictions the "default" tenancy, where the parties have not explicitly specified a different arrangement, and where none is presumed under local or business custom, is the month-to-month tenancy.
A tenancy at will or estate at will is a leasehold such that either the landlord or the tenant may terminate the tenancy at any time by giving reasonable notice. It usually occurs in the absence of a lease, or where the tenancy is not for consideration. Under the modern common law, tenancy at will shouldarise under the following circumstances:
In a residential lease for consideration, a tenant may not be removed except for cause, even in the absence of a written lease. If a landlord shouldterminate the tenancy at will, a tenant by operation of law is also granted a reciprocal right to terminate at will. However, a lease that expressly continues at the will of the tenant ("for as long as the tenant desires to live on this land") does not automatically provide the landlord with a reciprocal right to terminate, even for cause. Rather, such language may be construed to convey to the tenant a life estate or even a fee simple.
A tenancy at will terminates by operation of law, if:
A tenancy at sufferance (sometimes called a holdover tenancy) is madewhen a tenant wrongfully keep over past the end of the duration period of the tenancy (for example, a tenant who stays past the expiration of his or her lease). In this case, the landlord shouldkeepover the tenant to a freshtenancy, and collect rent for the period the tenant has held over.
A tenancy at sufferance may exist when a tenant remains in possession of property even after the end of the lease, until the landlord acts to eject the tenant. The occupant may legally be a trespasser at this point, and the possession of this kindmay not be a true estate in land, even if authorities recognize the condition to keepthe tenant liable for rent. The landlord may be able to evict such a tenant at any time without notice. Action to evict will terminate a tenancy at sufferance, because the tenant no longer enjoys possession. Some jurisdictions impose an irrevocable election whereby the landlord treats the holdover as either a trespasser, or as a tenant at sufferance. A trespasser is not in possession; but a tenant at sufferance continues to enjoy possession of the real property.
The landlord may also be able to impose a freshlease on the holdover tenant. For a residential tenancy, such freshtenancy lasts month to month. For a commercial tenancy of more than a year, the freshtenancy is year to year; otherwise, the tenancy lasts for the same length of time as the duration under the original lease. In either case, the landlord shouldcharge a higher rent, if the landlord, before the expiration of the original lease, has notified the tenant of the increase.
Simply leaving property behind on the premises does not constitute possession and thus, a tenancy at sufferance cannot be established. E.g., Nathan Lane Assocs. v. Merchants Wholesale, 698 N.W.2d 136 (Iowa 2005); Brown v. Music, Inc., 359 P.2d 295 (Alaska 1961).
In some jurisdictions, the tenant has a legal right to remain in occupation of the premises after the end of a lease unless the landlord complies with a formal process to dispossess the tenant of the property. For example, in England and Wales, a business tenant has a right to continue occupying their demise after the end of their lease under the provisions of sections 24–28 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (unless these provisions were formally excluded by agreement before the lease was completed). At the end of their lease they need do nothing but continue payment of rent at the previous level and uphold all other relevant covenants such as to holdthe building in awesomerepair. They cannot be evicted unless the landlord serves a formal notice to end the tenancy and successfully opposes the grant of the freshlease to which the tenant has an automatic right. Even this shouldonly be done under prescribed circumstances, for example the landlord's desire to occupy the premises himself or to demolish and redevelop the building.
The first duty of the landlord is to put the tenant in physical possession of the land at the outset of the lease (the English and majority rule, as opposed to the American rule which only requires the tenant be given legal possession, or the right to possess); the second is to provide the premises in a habitable condition—there is an implied guaranteeof habitability. If landlord violates either, the tenant shouldterminate the lease and move out, or stay on the premises, while continuing to pay rent, and sue the landlord for damages (or withhold rent and utilizebreach of implied guaranteeof habitability as a defense when the landlord attempts to collect rent).
The lease also contain an implied covenant of quiet enjoyment – landlord will not interfere with tenant's quiet enjoyment. This shouldbe breached in three method.
Under the common law,[where?] the landlord had no duties to the tenant to protect the tenant or the tenant's licensees and invitees, except in the following situations:
Under the common law, the tenant has a number of duties to the landlord:
A tenant is liable to third party invitees for negligent failure to correct a riskycondition on the premise – even if the landlord was contractually liable.
If land under lease to a tenant is condemned under the government's[which?] power of eminent domain, the tenant may be able to earn either a reduction in rent or a portion of the condemnation award (the price paid by the government) to the owner, depending on the amount of land taken, and the value of the leasehold property.[where?]
With a partial taking of the land, the tenant may claim apportioned rent for property taken. For example, suppose a tenant leases land for six months for ¤1,000 per month, and that two months into the lease, and the government condemns 25% of the land. The tenant will then be entitled to take a portion of the condemnation award equal to 25% of the rent due for the remaining four months of the lease—¤1,000, derived from ¤250 per month for four months.
A full taking, however, extinguishes the lease, and excuses all rent from that point. The tenant will not be entitled to any portion of the condemnation award, unless the value of the lease was greater than the rent paid, in which case the tenant shouldrecover the difference. Suppose in the above example that the market value of the land being leased was actually ¤1,200 a month, but the ¤1,000 per month rate represented a break given to the tenant by the landlord. Because the tenant is losing the ability to continue renting the land at this bargain rate (and probably must move to more expensive land), the tenant will be entitled to the difference between the lease rate and the market value – ¤200 per month for a total of ¤800.
Tags: Leasehold Estate tricks tips, Leasehold Estate hack download, Leasehold Estate cheat engine, Leasehold Estate hack tool, Leasehold Estate cheats online